<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:collegepublisher="http://collegepublisher.com/rss/1.0/">
		<channel>
		
		<title>The Slate</title>
		<description>Opinion articles from the current online edition of The Slate.</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.simpsonslate.com</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:42:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>20</ttl>
		
					<item>
						<title>Censorship for All</title>
						<link>http://www.simpsonslate.com/news/2010/04/01/Opinion/Censorship.For.All-3907194.shtml</link>
						<description>I have recently been exposed to the seemingly unfortunate world of limitations, as I have observed opinions being mercilessly dissected and creativity muffled. Ingenuity, of course, is no excuse for vulgar topics such as [expletive] or [expletive]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While my immediate reaction to this most tragic of circumstances was anger complemented by resentment, I have further analyzed the backbone to the counterpart's argument and realized the nonsensical values to which I have directed my attention.</description>
						<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">9f36dec0-3e74-4058-b050-175d4d04439a</guid>
						<collegepublisher:section>Opinion</collegepublisher:section>
						<collegepublisher:parentsection/>
						<collegepublisher:issuedate>4/01/10</collegepublisher:issuedate>
						<collegepublisher:subheadline/>
						<collegepublisher:author>Elizabeth Cifu</collegepublisher:author>
						<collegepublisher:authortitle/>
						<collegepublisher:thumbnail/>
						<collegepublisher:sectionlink>http://www.simpsonslate.com/news/2010/04/01/Opinion/</collegepublisher:sectionlink>
						<collegepublisher:sectioncategory>Opinion/Editorial</collegepublisher:sectioncategory>
					</item>
					
				
		</channel>
		</rss>